![]() ![]() We conclude that a different research agenda must be followed if the public health approach to gambling policy is to improve policy outcomes. Moreover, even on its own terms, it is seriously flawed. The main reason for this shortcoming is that existing research is aimed at exploring pathology not social processes. We find that it does not and in fact yields conclusions that are either inconclusive or inconsistent in crucial areas. Without a firm factual basis, the public health approach is a warmed-over version of the status quo.Īs a step towards developing such an approach this paper questions whether existing research provides the required factual basis. Such a policy approach depends, however, upon careful socio-economic analysis to guide the allocation of resources to education, information provision or treatment. The Act is intended to incorporate a "public health approach" to gambling policy (Korn and Shaffer 1999, Ministry of Health 2002). The Gambling Act, which was passed into law in September 2003, was a direct output of the Gaming Review. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |